6.4 Navigating Major Life Transitions

Every life transition tests a relationship. Moving in. Getting married. Having kids. Career upheavals. Health crises. Children leaving. Each one can bring you closer or push you apart. What makes the difference?

Transitions as Stress Tests

Major life transitions don’t cause relationship problems — they reveal them. The stress strips away buffers, exposes cracks, and tests whether your foundation can hold.

But transitions also create opportunities. They’re moments when patterns can shift, when you can consciously rebuild rather than drift.

Here’s what research tells us about navigating each major transition.

Moving In Together

Living together seems like a natural next step. But research reveals it’s more complicated than it appears.

The Cohabitation Effect

A longitudinal study tracking couples found that after moving in together, relationships showed declines in quality and interpersonal commitment, even as structural constraints to stay together increased.^[1]

The paradox: you feel more stuck while feeling less satisfied.

Sliding vs. Deciding

Why does cohabitation sometimes hurt relationships? Research points to a crucial distinction: sliding versus deciding.^[2]

Sliding means drifting into cohabitation — “It just made sense,” “The lease was up,” “We were spending every night together anyway.”

Deciding means explicitly choosing cohabitation as a commitment step — discussing what it means, aligning on expectations, making it intentional.

Couples who slide accumulate inertia — constraints that keep them together (shared lease, intertwined finances, hassle of breaking up) even when the relationship isn’t working. They’ve made it harder to leave without making the relationship better.

The protective factor: Treating moving in as a deliberate commitment, not a convenience. Discussing:

What does this mean for our future?
What are our expectations about finances, housework, space?
Are we on the same timeline toward marriage (or not)?

Who It Affects Most

Research found that the cohabitation effect on marital quality is driven by specific circumstances — particularly couples with children born before marriage.^[3] Couples who cohabited without these complications reported similar marital quality to those who didn’t cohabit.

The takeaway: Cohabitation itself isn’t the problem. Uncommitted, unexamined cohabitation is.

Getting Married

Marriage changes relationships — but not always in the ways people expect.

The Honeymoon Bump (and Drop)

Contrary to popular belief, marriage doesn’t dramatically improve relationship quality. Couples who marry typically show a small satisfaction bump followed by gradual decline — similar to couples who don’t marry.

What marriage does is change commitment structure. It creates legal, social, and psychological bonds that increase staying power — for better and worse.

Making the Transition Successful

Research identifies factors that predict positive marriage transitions:

Explicit commitment before marriage (not sliding into it)
Realistic expectations (not assuming marriage will fix problems)
Strong conflict resolution skills (problems don’t disappear with vows)
Similar family-of-origin experiences or conscious processing of differences

The Transition to Parenthood

Here’s the finding that surprises many couples: having children is hard on relationships.

The Research Reality

A meta-analysis of 37 studies found significant declines in relationship satisfaction from pregnancy through the first year postpartum — for both mothers and fathers.^[4]

An 8-year longitudinal study of 218 couples found “sudden deterioration following birth” on both observed and self-reported measures. The decline was small to medium in size and — critically — persisted throughout the remaining study years.^[5]

What Drives the Decline

Sleep deprivation — Impairs emotional regulation, increases irritability
Reduced couple time — Fewer opportunities for connection
Role conflicts — Who does what, expectations vs. reality
Stress accumulation — Financial, practical, physical
Identity shifts — Becoming “parents” vs. being partners
Sexual intimacy changes — Frequency, desire, physical recovery

Who’s Protected

Not everyone declines. Protective factors include:

Strong relationship quality before baby — The better your foundation, the more resilient you are
Realistic expectations — Expecting difficulty prevents shock
Active relationship maintenance — Couples who prioritize connection fare better
Shared workload — Equitable division of childcare and household tasks
Social support — Help from family, friends, community

The Critical Insight

The meta-analysis found something important: childless newlyweds showed similar declines over comparable time periods.^[4] Some decline is normal in early relationships regardless of children.

Parenthood accelerates and intensifies normal relationship challenges. It doesn’t create problems from nothing — it surfaces what was already there.

Career Changes and Relocations

Jobs matter to relationships. They structure time, provide identity, create stress, and sometimes require uprooting your life.

Relocation Stress

A longitudinal study of 206 couples tracked experiences before and after major moves.^[6]

Good news: Most relocation stressors — career challenges, housing issues, logistics — declined over the 12 months following a move. Some rewards, like finances, increased.

Complications: International moves brought more initial stress than domestic ones. And the trajectory varied by resources — couples with more financial stability and stronger relationships reported less strain.

Career Transitions

What happens when one partner’s career changes dramatically — promotion, job loss, new opportunity, burnout?

Research shows that synchronized transitions produce better outcomes than asynchronous ones.^[7] When both partners experience change together, they adapt together. When one changes while the other stays static, strain develops.

Dual-Career Challenges

Modern couples often navigate two careers, each with its own demands. Research identifies key success factors:

Explicit priority setting — Whose career takes precedence when? Under what circumstances?
Flexibility — Willingness to adjust based on changing circumstances
Support — Active investment in partner’s success, not just tolerance
Communication — Ongoing conversation about how it’s going, what needs adjusting

Health Challenges and Chronic Illness

When one partner faces serious health issues, the relationship becomes caregiving as well as partnership.

The Dyadic Coping Model

A comprehensive model of couples coping with chronic illness emphasizes that it unfolds as a shared process.^[8] The stress isn’t just the patient’s — it’s the couple’s.

A systematic review found that positive dyadic coping — viewing illness as a shared challenge, communicating openly about it, coping together — was associated with better physical health, psychological well-being, and relationship satisfaction for both partners.^[9]

What Helps

A meta-analysis of 72 independent samples (17,856 participants) found dyadic coping consistently predicted relationship satisfaction in both healthy couples and those facing illness.^[10]

Effective dyadic coping includes:

Stress communication — Sharing how you’re feeling, what you need
Supportive coping — Helping partner manage their stress
Common coping — Facing the challenge together as a team
Delegated coping — One partner taking over tasks when the other is overwhelmed

When Professional Help Matters

A meta-analysis of couple-oriented interventions for chronic illness found small but significant positive effects.^[11] Interventions were most effective for couples with:

High illness-related conflict
Low partner support
Low baseline marital quality

The implication: If illness is straining your relationship, couples therapy can help — especially if you’re already struggling.

The Empty Nest

Children leaving home represents a major transition — often dreaded but frequently welcomed.

The Surprising Research

An 18-year longitudinal study found that marital satisfaction increased in middle age, specifically linked to the empty nest transition.^[12]

The increase came through greater enjoyment of time with partners — not more time necessarily, but better quality time. And importantly, it wasn’t explained by changing partners.

A study of 3,765 couples found empty nest status directly linked with higher marital closeness for both husbands and wives, plus better perceived health for wives.^[13]

What Changes

Research on empty nest transitions consistently identifies several themes of relationship change:^[14]

Increased couple time — Opportunity to reconnect
Reduced structure — Freedom from child-centered schedules
Increased communication — More space to talk
Increased privacy — Intimacy without interruption
New beginnings — Opportunity to reinvent the relationship

The Risk

Not everyone thrives. Couples who:

Built their entire identity around parenting
Avoided relationship issues by focusing on kids
Have nothing in common outside of children
Never maintained their connection as a couple

…may struggle when children leave. The empty nest reveals what was always there — or wasn’t.

Making It Successful

Prepare before they leave — Reconnect as a couple while kids are still home
Grieve the transition — Loss is real even when change is positive
Explore together — Use the freedom to try new things
Reinvest in intimacy — Sexual and emotional
Create new shared purpose — What are you building now?

Retirement

The final major transition: both partners at home, all day, every day.

When Retirement Goes Well

Longitudinal research found that retirement’s effect on relationships depends heavily on how it happens.^[7]

Best outcomes: Both partners retire together, ideally by choice, with adequate financial resources.

Worst outcomes: Asynchronous retirement — one partner retires while the other continues working. This creates role confusion, schedule conflicts, and resentment regardless of gender.

A study of 458 married individuals found that older couples showed decreased potential for marital conflict and increased affection compared to middle-aged counterparts.^[15] But the transition period itself is vulnerable.

Making It Work

Plan together — Retirement should be a joint decision, not a surprise
Synchronize if possible — Retiring at similar times reduces strain
Discuss expectations — What will each day look like? How much together time? Separate time?
Maintain individual identity — Hobbies, friendships, purpose beyond the relationship
Renegotiate household tasks — Roles that worked before may not work now

The Universal Principles

Across all transitions, research identifies common factors:

What Helps

Anticipation and preparation — Knowing what’s coming allows proactive adjustment
Explicit communication — Discussing expectations, fears, needs
Flexibility — Willingness to renegotiate as circumstances change
Maintenance behaviors — Continuing to invest in the relationship during stress
Support seeking — Using social networks, professional help when needed
Shared framing — Viewing challenges as “us against the problem” not “me against you”

What Hurts

Sliding into transitions — Letting things happen without explicit choice
Unrealistic expectations — Assuming transitions will be easy or will fix problems
Neglecting the relationship — Getting absorbed in transition logistics
Asynchronous change — Partners on different timelines or pages
Avoiding difficult conversations — Problems don’t disappear; they compound

Reflection

Think about transitions you’ve faced or are approaching:

Did you slide or decide into major changes?
How well did you maintain your relationship during stressful periods?
What’s the next major transition on your horizon?
Are you and your partner aligned on expectations?
What support structures do you have in place?

One Thing to Try

Identify your next transition and have a planning conversation.

Every couple has a transition approaching — moving in, career change, health concern, children leaving, retirement. Even if it’s years away, discussing it now helps.

Ask each other:

What are your hopes for this transition?
What are your fears?
What do we need to prepare?
How will we maintain our connection during the stress?

Transitions are inevitable. Being blindsided by them isn’t.

References

Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2012). The impact of the transition to cohabitation on relationship functioning: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(3), 348-358. doi:10.1037/a0028316
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499-509. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x
Tach, L., & Halpern-Meekin, S. (2009). How does premarital cohabitation affect trajectories of marital quality? Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 298-317. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00600.x
Mitnick, D. M., Heyman, R. E., & Slep, A. M. S. (2009). Changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 848-852. doi:10.1037/a0017004
Doss, B. D., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: An 8-year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 601-619. doi:10.1037/a0013969
Naeimi, H., et al. (2025). On the move: Trajectories of stressors and rewards among relocating couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/01461672251355002
Moen, P., Kim, J. E., & Hofmeister, H. (2001). Couples’ work/retirement transitions, gender, and marital quality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(1), 55-71. doi:10.2307/3090150
Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 920-954. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920
Weitkamp, K., et al. (2021). Dyadic coping in couples facing chronic physical illness: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 722740. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722740
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28-46. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
Martire, L. M., et al. (2010). Review and meta-analysis of couple-oriented interventions for chronic illness. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40(3), 325-342. doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9216-2
Gorchoff, S. M., John, O. P., & Helson, R. (2008). Contextualizing change in marital satisfaction during middle age: An 18-year longitudinal study. Psychological Science, 19, 1194-1200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02222.x
Tracy, E. L., Putney, J. M., & Papp, L. M. (2022). Empty nest status, marital closeness, and perceived health. The Family Journal, 30(1), 30-35. doi:10.1177/10664807211027287
Bouchard, G. (2018). A dyadic examination of marital quality at the empty-nest phase. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 86(1), 34-50. doi:10.1177/0091415017691285
Kim, J. E., & Moen, P. (2002). Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well-being: A life-course, ecological model. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 57(3), P212-P222. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.3.P212

Next: Relationship Maintenance Rituals — daily, weekly, and yearly practices that keep relationships healthy.

Or go back to: Growing Together, Not Apart